By Alexandros Petersen | EUobserver
BRUSSELS - It
is no secret that Russian dominance of European natural gas markets has
splintered the Union.
The imperative
of having enough heat or cooking fuel in the winter has put countries –
especially in central and eastern Europe – in two camps: those who make
bilateral deals with Russia’s energy behemoth Gazprom (Western unity be
damned), and those who suffer from the disunity and call continually not just
for co-ordinated policies to withstand Moscow’s pressure, but also for
alternative resources from the Caspian region or elsewhere to diversify supply.
The second camp
has it right, but they – as well as Euro-Atlantic institutions – have sabotaged
their own efforts by seeking to dictate terms to alternative producers, such as
Azerbaijan.
All the while,
the pro-Russia camp has made gains.
Earlier in March, Serbia passed a constitutional amendment on land
ownership to make it easier for Gazprom to buy up the land it needs for a major
pipeline project aimed at increasing southeastern Europe’s dependence on
Russian resources and defeating regional plans for diversification. This follows
Germany’s joint development with Russia of the Nord Stream pipeline, which
connects German consumers directly to Russian fields across the Baltic Sea. It
bypasses and undermines the energy security of fellow Nato and European Union
members, Poland and the Baltic states.
The problem
with these policies is that in making a bilateral deal with Gazprom on natural
gas supply, individual European countries are in fact coming in line with
Kremlin policy which seeks to divide and conquer the continent.